{"id":"W3090054056","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00630","title":"(Re)considering the Concept of Literature Review Reproducibility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; HEC Montréal; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Ambiguity; Transparency (behavior); Field (mathematics); Trustworthiness; Engineering ethics; Systematic review; Process (computing); Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Linguistics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005317351,0.00005795743,0.000204458,0.00003955312,0.00007313929,0.0001700796,0.0007753656,0.00004307068,6.445707e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02072923,0.00003188169,0.0001694661,0.0005600784,0.000008918826,0.001229095,0.00009674892,0.0002125675,0.000002903205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001462311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.130837e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981839,0.0001556731,0.0008088549,0.00007387812,0.0006796155,0.00009806819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955533,0.0008987598,0.00164352,0.0004911169,0.001374381,0.00003890993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007853247,0.00007657509,0.05748412,0.01407265,0.001064064,0.000002237378,0.1093519,0.0802449,0.000436499,0.03897262,0.6803311,0.01788475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002193553,0.0003914162,0.02644886,0.009847226,0.0001290622,0.0001157256,0.001403048,0.03916523,0.00652353,0.000414533,0.9129292,0.0004386624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01536954,0.08181702,0.6332151,0.2440333,0.01504008,0.007954077,0.0001800741,0.0003466056,0.002044182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974554,0.0002815421,0.0008403357,0.00109711,0.0002361791,0.00001187569,0.000001651465,0.000003967184,0.00007191076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02757078699391662,"score_gpt":0.2770192108680183,"score_spread":0.2494484238741017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}