{"id":"W3090351797","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2020.108954","title":"Cut-off phenomenon for the maximum of a sampling of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Mathematics; Ergodic theory; Context (archaeology); Combinatorics; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Limiting; Distribution (mathematics); Gaussian; Stochastic process; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Statistics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003622542,0.0007101626,0.001036756,0.001538866,0.001133761,0.00191508,0.001932884,0.001442727,0.002647944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01721095,0.0003656059,0.001319102,0.0006193783,0.003274433,0.002968563,0.002439342,0.002207559,0.0002462206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002023801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006716676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001714516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009496093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986982,0.0004360433,0.00005750276,0.0002791286,0.0003464925,0.0001826685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993139,0.004041967,0.0008373254,0.0004520633,0.0006585926,0.0008710021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001544548,0.00005853018,0.003408274,0.0001592392,0.0001060971,0.0005048269,0.0005827578,0.04047445,0.007587118,0.9393252,0.0008347554,0.006804321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004409541,0.000173973,0.003429219,0.0000995202,0.00006241877,0.0005674875,0.0002445906,0.6260957,0.003625348,0.3626013,0.002976741,0.00007962678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4958501,0.002282426,0.482964,0.0009930909,0.0001475509,0.00007537556,0.0001682196,0.000450406,0.01706881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785276,0.0003819361,0.01765636,0.0001526343,0.00006663972,0.00007592604,0.0001202719,0.0000957356,0.002923019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003622542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01915807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09244527855395977,"score_gpt":0.1859043012838415,"score_spread":0.09345902272988175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}