{"id":"W3091369864","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2020.103489","title":"An efficient multivariate threshold ring signature scheme","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","topic":"Cryptography and Data Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Australian Research Council; Concordia University of Edmonton","keywords":"Ring signature; Signature (topology); Computer science; Protocol (science); Algorithm; Scheme (mathematics); Schnorr signature; Multivariate statistics; Identification (biology); Ring (chemistry); Mathematics; Blind signature; Encryption; Computer network; Public-key cryptography; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006980501,0.0004631421,0.0007683826,0.0005807766,0.0006191304,0.001486663,0.0007723637,0.0006357381,0.006589032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001333165,0.0002663506,0.0004462303,0.00123169,0.0005379495,0.003287772,0.00202311,0.001282401,0.002259922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009435567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001631839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000323464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.0001642089,0.00008166666,0.0001626598,0.0004753062,0.0001714318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993319,0.0001107927,0.0001024728,0.0002619746,0.000108202,0.00008471258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001955718,0.0004340512,0.00115932,0.0004777948,0.00008835929,0.0003153586,0.0002847063,0.03041408,0.1353431,0.5238952,0.01288551,0.2927467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256844,0.0009133366,0.002100433,0.00010354,0.0002214672,0.002047964,0.0001623261,0.3634257,0.1396249,0.3977928,0.0927318,0.0002500724],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1558033,0.001317491,0.8071938,0.001714816,0.0003899997,0.0003554466,0.0009391114,0.003264397,0.0290216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815142,0.000639973,0.1602671,0.0002809927,0.0001654835,0.0001188191,0.0007762336,0.0001693163,0.02244001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006589032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02204251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01840735275007331,"score_gpt":0.2825570079851645,"score_spread":0.2641496552350912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}