{"id":"W3093170289","doi":"10.2981/wlb.00697","title":"Comparison of grizzly bear hair‐snag and scat sampling along roads to inform wildlife population monitoring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada)","funders":"Norsk institutt for Bioøkonomi; Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Sampling (signal processing); Snag; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Ursus; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004179816,0.0004244338,0.0003213906,0.001219738,0.0003457875,0.0006746301,0.0007427191,0.0004157995,0.001085895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006834414,0.0002037686,0.0004582869,0.0007884668,0.0002766151,0.0008826472,0.0005524734,0.0002405268,0.000451367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004710684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005486385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009398923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03479267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995797,0.002251991,0.0001967705,0.0007055296,0.0008274939,0.0002210914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922979,0.00230085,0.002013533,0.0005553576,0.002493185,0.0003390583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005676236,0.0001411466,0.9452825,0.0001553681,0.0001927326,0.0001132797,0.0006286183,0.00154948,0.003345548,0.0001849732,0.0009072015,0.04693144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002470043,0.0006142911,0.9872836,0.00008176979,0.0001889167,0.0002186233,0.0007902287,0.006080233,0.002406572,0.0001297025,0.002159293,0.00002211477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886009,0.0004978105,0.005800529,0.000153006,0.00006152439,0.0002204707,0.0007646519,0.00007460528,0.003826481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811037,0.0004134072,0.01598507,0.0001326433,0.00004509735,0.0001982067,0.001031691,0.00003076035,0.001059365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009398923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02210528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05130260619533972,"score_gpt":0.3122252824052885,"score_spread":0.2609226762099487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}