{"id":"W3093830251","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113401","title":"Health technology assessment and judicial deference to priority-setting decisions in healthcare: Quasi-experimental analysis of right-to-health litigation in Brazil","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Public Health in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Centre for Global Health Research; McMaster University; York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Deference; Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Health care; Judicial deference; Health policy; Health technology; Public administration; Law; Political science; Medicine; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05272157,0.0006034246,0.001629884,0.00108781,0.003704487,0.003136762,0.002497661,0.002711676,0.007138942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1535816,0.0009843577,0.002125524,0.001116549,0.008031129,0.00210906,0.002070307,0.004037602,0.0005484147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005319623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007464836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01728082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01790155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9325868,0.05334359,0.002343882,0.00471692,0.004147285,0.002861534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6855752,0.2487581,0.04099697,0.01603686,0.005858459,0.002774438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03672534,0.2066972,0.4162896,0.003623235,0.004306009,0.002520507,0.1221671,0.007718663,0.01267005,0.1092858,0.004155881,0.07384066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02206117,0.1313105,0.6058923,0.001802505,0.004696103,0.001119492,0.06998763,0.06840765,0.01039346,0.06635424,0.01719766,0.0007773672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935574,0.000204302,0.001674965,0.0003738562,0.00002702573,0.001336971,0.0001080333,0.000005469418,0.002711942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955331,0.00008340102,0.001574274,0.0003031584,0.00002706876,0.001710174,0.00007791487,0.000005000793,0.0006858353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05272157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2788216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05160477151587918,"score_gpt":0.4770712053174314,"score_spread":0.4254664338015522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}