{"id":"W3093830251","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113401","title":"Health technology assessment and judicial deference to priority-setting decisions in healthcare: Quasi-experimental analysis of right-to-health litigation in Brazil","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Public Health in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Centre for Global Health Research; McMaster University; York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Deference; Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Health care; Judicial deference; Health policy; Health technology; Public administration; Law; Political science; Medicine; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009563211,0.0001640322,0.000901075,0.001803133,0.00129639,0.000039363,0.0006801357,0.0001429641,0.00002997872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003780518,0.000162453,0.00003792862,0.01932153,0.001548897,0.0002898951,0.0001913925,0.0004656234,0.000002179775],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002334544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007153796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04969736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05061184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946004,0.0006934627,0.001144272,0.0007738271,0.001658152,0.001129936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975873,0.0003469254,0.0004072287,0.0001804681,0.0002360097,0.001242125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003257658,0.0002974498,0.3906315,0.00003646036,0.00001318468,0.000005307449,0.3276668,0.00001396349,0.0009229032,0.1385494,0.0005488466,0.1412816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103377,0.002171185,0.922152,0.0003156521,0.00001749656,7.018756e-7,0.06429534,0.0006318867,0.00007395713,0.004838601,0.004061044,0.0003387631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5381208,0.000154026,0.000555312,0.4598626,0.000162513,0.0006725289,0.00001118374,0.0000384533,0.0004225498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979067,0.00009400232,0.001233665,0.01932224,0.0002206652,0.00004668833,0.000006002807,0.000007375368,0.000002368801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05160477151587918,"score_gpt":0.4770712053174314,"score_spread":0.4254664338015522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}