{"id":"W3093840653","doi":"10.1177/0018720820960865","title":"Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":522,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Teamwork; Inclusion (mineral); Set (abstract data type); Agency (philosophy); Knowledge management; Empirical research; Computer science; Team composition; Task (project management); Government (linguistics); Process management; Psychology; Management science; Business; Social psychology; Political science; Management; Engineering; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006302169,0.0007515294,0.001923747,0.01096954,0.00099259,0.003311099,0.001599658,0.001794531,0.003056502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02013481,0.0007161682,0.001281788,0.0170433,0.00159537,0.003971377,0.001413519,0.001401391,0.0005651224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003187081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008981213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00514613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007315656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963682,0.001203284,0.00084607,0.0003945617,0.001014318,0.0001735889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741046,0.01974559,0.002322198,0.0003058966,0.003149422,0.0003722532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001640785,0.0001420018,0.00567774,0.1863407,0.0006458777,0.0005059542,0.002438967,0.000614647,0.0002645245,0.00758103,0.01831018,0.7773144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006098575,0.0003935023,0.04150611,0.5068749,0.00247524,0.002839733,0.01210715,0.0006024542,0.0005312329,0.00911582,0.4233634,0.0001293866],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001002688,0.9968382,0.0002524658,0.000797872,0.0001154086,0.00001778739,0.00003701946,0.000004497248,0.0009339717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009285608,0.9896286,0.0005076941,0.0002809907,0.000102477,0.00003905232,0.00004815728,0.000004407953,0.0001031388],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03332943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09966613329407109,"score_gpt":0.3694085309428706,"score_spread":0.2697423976487995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}