{"id":"W3094744592","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.8508","title":"Examining Academic Integrity Using Course-Level Learning Outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Learning development; Academic achievement; Higher education; Mathematics education; Data integrity; Audit; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Management; Computer security; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01506327,0.0003581496,0.0007929901,0.01051879,0.001069312,0.003207279,0.00139786,0.0004671652,0.002940592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08532079,0.0001322968,0.0008118671,0.008422076,0.0007656545,0.003002413,0.002721097,0.001299393,0.0007195474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003625645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006752421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007754176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01587924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876531,0.002831825,0.001252455,0.0009978518,0.00674393,0.0005207935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073692,0.02814491,0.02348953,0.003139087,0.03496995,0.002887406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001243629,0.0006036123,0.4778293,0.00200926,0.000618352,0.0000754209,0.002114357,0.001140251,0.0006947049,0.002145343,0.005997401,0.5066477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000271085,0.0009733556,0.9550689,0.002601161,0.0004571149,0.0001930022,0.00280334,0.001309376,0.004418788,0.001702823,0.03035204,0.00009301195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.892497,0.02062153,0.02094056,0.005081096,0.0004358321,0.0007306795,0.00574941,0.0005677539,0.05337614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813713,0.004448437,0.007570965,0.000426605,0.00009285013,0.000275577,0.002645203,0.00006557303,0.003103458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07966316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2472324269926388,"score_gpt":0.3901059812827297,"score_spread":0.1428735542900909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}