{"id":"W3095434763","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118734","title":"The effect of ecological restoration methods on carbon stocks in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Carbon stock; Forest restoration; Threatened species; Climate change mitigation; Agroforestry; Global warming; Ecosystem; Soil carbon; Greenhouse gas; Forest ecology; Ecology; Forestry; Climate change; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Carbon dioxide; Soil water; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008431865,0.0002935628,0.0002766428,0.0005113832,0.0007713763,0.0006684398,0.0004485513,0.0003295502,0.001154392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00458768,0.00009183139,0.0003089587,0.000505472,0.0008004191,0.000468204,0.0006704447,0.0003323646,0.00008887678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002014844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1013325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2883137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999542,0.0001231663,0.00003951559,0.00005437038,0.0001280658,0.0001127981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.0003438248,0.0004589716,0.0001650737,0.0004679234,0.0003495566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002076583,0.0008851787,0.8497656,0.0002735443,0.0003936225,0.0004505774,0.002249037,0.007475936,0.01302253,0.002662585,0.0009250368,0.1198197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002007419,0.0002259258,0.9933463,0.00003716135,0.00008662615,0.0000839869,0.001151823,0.002053443,0.0008408764,0.0004159409,0.001729404,0.000008511263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997735,0.0003306656,0.0001059662,0.0001676184,0.00001056893,0.000008622903,0.000068528,0.00000567098,0.00156723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.0001138879,0.0001406172,0.00002017692,0.000004517055,0.000003916791,0.00004372908,0.000002337503,0.0002758036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1013325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2014853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01075272807864688,"score_gpt":0.2409622681072515,"score_spread":0.2302095400286047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}