{"id":"W3095596037","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giab025","title":"An analysis of security vulnerabilities in container images for scientific data analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"GigaScience","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Container (type theory); Vulnerability (computing); Computer science; Software deployment; Software; Secure coding; Computer security; Vulnerability management; Vulnerability assessment; Software security assurance; Security analysis; Attack surface; Security bug; Information security; Software engineering; Engineering; Operating system; Security service","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004748957,0.0008542984,0.0004819207,0.004262473,0.0009080886,0.001799696,0.0009444463,0.001072425,0.001504975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03242838,0.0004992794,0.001106122,0.00277248,0.001495984,0.003181153,0.0019777,0.001371182,0.0005014541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001371672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00154219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00331409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957219,0.0009668779,0.0003834753,0.0006173291,0.001934107,0.0003761902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534236,0.02451387,0.006462618,0.006800914,0.008003563,0.000795303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002514567,0.0009682882,0.4347541,0.001811441,0.0008516873,0.004666441,0.007372648,0.04691379,0.1139509,0.01671522,0.03215353,0.3373274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009847168,0.0008719005,0.3113728,0.0005643835,0.0007395173,0.005635781,0.003761425,0.3859379,0.2410783,0.02216319,0.02740455,0.0003717587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127202,0.00106337,0.07124405,0.0008675579,0.0001029442,0.0004318685,0.002662295,0.00707607,0.003831574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530259,0.0004657873,0.1408012,0.0001643604,0.00002976573,0.0002237449,0.003268317,0.00115625,0.0008646516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004748957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02511519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2169682895091375,"score_gpt":0.4556311981961609,"score_spread":0.2386629086870234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}