{"id":"W3095988554","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqaa175","title":"Cannabis use and work-related injuries: a cross-sectional analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational Medicine","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Sinai Health System; Occupational Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Work & Health; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging; University of Toronto","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Cannabis; Occupational safety and health; Work (physics); Medicine; Injury prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411415,0.0002485719,0.0004240685,0.001355007,0.0007588649,0.0007417688,0.0007001594,0.0004837278,0.0025439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002584039,0.0004808344,0.0007096708,0.002433031,0.000457501,0.0003533045,0.0006589746,0.0005480828,0.0003014168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001163083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002065413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1810665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2470035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.0001638873,0.00009974978,0.000154562,0.000323169,0.0001419641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974715,0.000486666,0.0009596481,0.0001946765,0.0004947867,0.0003928005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003861441,0.00002859974,0.9993217,0.00001461845,0.00008545791,0.00002394486,0.00005356262,0.00001439113,0.0000604651,0.00000618153,0.00003550196,0.0003169873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003226392,0.00004847974,0.9995708,0.000007088629,0.00004797209,0.00004451476,0.000116085,0.0000629908,0.00001610578,0.000004242941,0.00007638908,0.000002132836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980465,0.0004142476,0.0001125935,0.00003766894,0.00000421301,0.00003468002,0.0009892209,0.000003265161,0.0003576342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.0002889029,0.000152319,0.00002824376,0.000005628661,0.00002166408,0.0007513231,0.000002332965,0.0001562556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1810665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3600252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04883885850190617,"score_gpt":0.3580350571573119,"score_spread":0.3091961986554057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}