{"id":"W3096169222","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.13380","title":"Evaluation of machine learning–driven automated Kleihauer‐Betke counting: A method comparison study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","topic":"Blood groups and transfusion","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Cell counting; Intraclass correlation; Counting efficiency; Limits of agreement; Automated method; Computer science; Nuclear medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Reproducibility; Detector; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02860325,0.001488177,0.001399952,0.002511257,0.0006164713,0.001637066,0.001794978,0.001572222,0.001295497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06554941,0.0004075071,0.001474574,0.00122962,0.0007381017,0.001155863,0.001164201,0.0007644934,0.0003596269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001687989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001202775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002807322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001516594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808796,0.01126242,0.001767913,0.002235237,0.003567908,0.0002869316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9017702,0.07354821,0.005411384,0.004330793,0.01392572,0.001013764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04030969,0.003872146,0.2423622,0.002908102,0.00640946,0.0004608979,0.001057991,0.09314469,0.01151111,0.001492283,0.003867791,0.5926036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001813654,0.01244937,0.1313517,0.0002734403,0.001632086,0.001249189,0.0003419816,0.8355293,0.01138757,0.001367132,0.002344584,0.0002599199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922064,0.006731968,0.09612296,0.0002022997,0.0002909631,0.001302352,0.0008078066,0.0008340378,0.001501154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504754,0.0007190821,0.04588312,0.0001190611,0.0001056728,0.0008411546,0.001221347,0.0001220959,0.000512896],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02860325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1512702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04888584186350851,"score_gpt":0.3990625400842109,"score_spread":0.3501766982207024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}