{"id":"W3096169222","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.13380","title":"Evaluation of machine learning–driven automated Kleihauer‐Betke counting: A method comparison study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","topic":"Blood groups and transfusion","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Cell counting; Intraclass correlation; Counting efficiency; Limits of agreement; Automated method; Computer science; Nuclear medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Reproducibility; Detector; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001813638,0.0001337772,0.0006456813,0.0002246496,0.00003114,0.00001285096,0.000213676,0.00009519132,0.0002367728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009091508,0.0001122262,0.000109569,0.000273266,0.00004357977,0.000115208,0.00003973823,0.0004425522,0.000009019585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006768107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004281286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002308966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002115924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967411,0.0006122657,0.0009298025,0.0001650298,0.001437673,0.0001141506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942378,0.000157532,0.0008354269,0.00008832705,0.004556105,0.0001247826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001619247,0.002683127,0.9412233,0.0001053477,0.002962674,0.000557877,0.005348092,0.003069133,0.03735625,0.0007455586,0.0008766528,0.003452723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03691633,0.008270065,0.1358767,0.0005641024,0.005182993,0.002017159,0.005255494,0.7468529,0.05001746,0.0002157212,0.008358801,0.00047223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922337,0.0009581934,0.002367146,0.003499076,0.0004427512,0.0002848961,0.00001356241,0.0000526882,0.0001480082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967915,0.00002168342,0.002695987,0.0002927795,0.000161533,0.000003822569,0.00001210669,0.00001816237,0.000002441295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4576452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04888584186350851,"score_gpt":0.3990625400842109,"score_spread":0.3501766982207024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}