{"id":"W309657496","doi":"","title":"Estimating the Value of Forestry Eco-tourism Products by Contingent Valuation Method ESTIMATION DE VALEUR DES PRODUITS ÉCO-TOURISTIQUES SYLVICOLS PAR LA MÉTHODE D'EVALUATION CONTINGENTE","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Forestry; Tourism; Value (mathematics); Willingness to pay; Welfare economics; Economics; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003383883,0.0005466734,0.0005216306,0.002646695,0.0003357951,0.001266841,0.0005424002,0.0005787952,0.001824674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01020513,0.0002483312,0.0008768477,0.001594197,0.000521111,0.0009205543,0.0006417986,0.0006436096,0.0001692285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001054846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007742757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006317459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004284998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981266,0.001103173,0.00008197673,0.0001863401,0.000421084,0.00008081285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936244,0.005013009,0.0004267019,0.000302712,0.0005510302,0.00008208873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005227039,0.0002186429,0.2328255,0.0004076483,0.0004550049,0.0004716215,0.0005109389,0.4536183,0.01121703,0.02409281,0.001195221,0.2744646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001034499,0.00007852669,0.03887184,0.00004992955,0.00003147534,0.0001040774,0.0001482609,0.9534646,0.002864451,0.003716198,0.0006294173,0.00003086802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3913382,0.0004559472,0.6028357,0.0001972754,0.00004294631,0.000235591,0.0004284452,0.0001450836,0.004320937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965636,0.0001426519,0.1017816,0.00001649991,0.00001460733,0.0001716661,0.0001968766,0.00001139363,0.001101008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01789594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08042527368151993,"score_gpt":0.2986351279513898,"score_spread":0.2182098542698699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}