{"id":"W3096597668","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2019-0426","title":"Approximate analytical solution for ionizing cylindrical shock wave in rotational axisymmetric non-ideal gas: isothermal flow","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Adiabatic process; Shock wave; Rotational symmetry; Mechanics; Ideal gas; Axial symmetry; Isothermal flow; Classical mechanics; Oblique shock; Shock (circulatory); Isothermal process; Magnetic field; Flow (mathematics); Thermodynamics; Open-channel flow; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004107041,0.0007716964,0.0009222378,0.000856322,0.0006668174,0.0009703504,0.001219806,0.001839519,0.002673975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001381094,0.0003353405,0.0005180551,0.0006962492,0.001116092,0.000867604,0.0006494518,0.0006977594,0.0005142192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001352847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008942061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00463096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998527,0.00002798637,0.000005612728,0.00001947812,0.00005109202,0.00004312089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996611,0.00009845624,0.00007912178,0.00001563448,0.0001088974,0.00003680568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009436323,0.00006168364,0.001793555,0.0004235811,0.00002891048,0.001327636,0.0004001618,0.8698109,0.01156424,0.1043466,0.002434667,0.007713637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001125135,0.00001489628,0.000212042,0.00001105299,0.000003695195,0.00006022204,0.00005184122,0.9953502,0.0004041829,0.003296928,0.0005766547,0.000007014327],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2934506,0.004859267,0.6194158,0.001661716,0.0003113523,0.0002849624,0.0005659237,0.0007483845,0.07870212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245785,0.002358601,0.0428789,0.0002675887,0.0001792441,0.0002254896,0.0002685999,0.0001725736,0.02907055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008942061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01778007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0203576620479056,"score_gpt":0.206223642524321,"score_spread":0.1858659804764154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}