{"id":"W3097009948","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125680","title":"A simple and robust method for identifying the distribution functions of Manning’s roughness coefficient along a natural river","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hydrograph; Inflow; Routing (electronic design automation); Outflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Flow (mathematics); Flow routing; Stage (stratigraphy); Geology; Flood myth; Environmental science; Mathematics; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009644544,0.0008794969,0.0007249035,0.001638397,0.0004429165,0.0006278929,0.001158424,0.0009073759,0.001126218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004007829,0.000490257,0.0008575329,0.0008924885,0.000395853,0.0007059103,0.0007402664,0.001243958,0.0005849339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003036573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008717668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005592725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008105077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994915,0.0001043289,0.00003186679,0.0001660211,0.0001647298,0.00004156657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985061,0.0006089055,0.0002058219,0.0002605368,0.0003621496,0.00005650944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170263,0.0002173435,0.01202281,0.0002045654,0.000304659,0.0002346165,0.0001726669,0.2040785,0.09179279,0.007165493,0.003277273,0.6803591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002987843,0.00005955083,0.008553471,0.000009762274,0.0000350747,0.000179941,0.00003107876,0.9776313,0.008507171,0.002949493,0.001939256,0.00007416701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0207511,0.00007001374,0.9780079,0.00002973538,0.00002426721,0.00003871695,0.0001224806,0.0006755475,0.0002802433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2574762,0.0001330443,0.7393939,0.00004358452,0.00005557081,0.0001473742,0.0006814775,0.0001859579,0.001882787],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005592725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01112038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02440291881353474,"score_gpt":0.2762285012910025,"score_spread":0.2518255824774678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}