{"id":"W3097249441","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaa243","title":"Dealing With Treatment-Confounder Feedback and Sparse Follow-up in Longitudinal Studies: Application of a Marginal Structural Model in a Multiple Sclerosis Cohort","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Multiple Sclerosis Society","keywords":"Marginal structural model; Hazard ratio; Medicine; Imputation (statistics); Confounding; Cohort; Confidence interval; Proportional hazards model; Internal medicine; Cohort study; Multivariate statistics; Demography; Oncology; Missing data; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1068876,0.001343153,0.002601501,0.001591478,0.001546799,0.002414239,0.004535662,0.002971684,0.002586948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1699435,0.001355153,0.006452133,0.002348315,0.001923908,0.002294832,0.004198319,0.004597511,0.0002615537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002452779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004565767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04462291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04412292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9408185,0.05303591,0.001319094,0.002995733,0.0008610646,0.0009698139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7764112,0.2002376,0.008757006,0.009632689,0.003288089,0.001673294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005131301,0.000665794,0.3392235,0.001199708,0.01709784,0.002080485,0.004775639,0.4665546,0.001290517,0.06135182,0.004049861,0.09657899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007825,0.001035196,0.02851175,0.0002808258,0.00464317,0.0003882295,0.000467024,0.8929067,0.0004630551,0.06715854,0.003190781,0.0001721543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.345908,0.00268005,0.640179,0.006923424,0.0003381605,0.0009209626,0.00142388,0.0005221229,0.001104273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849798,0.0006823667,0.1455613,0.0007502083,0.0002114408,0.000908902,0.0007804217,0.00006909098,0.001238381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1068876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5652822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2247839908290774,"score_gpt":0.3853184617587508,"score_spread":0.1605344709296734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}