{"id":"W3097377773","doi":"10.1016/j.segan.2020.100405","title":"A novel simulation-based method for assessment of collusion potential in wholesale electricity markets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Shapley value; Bidding; Oligopoly; Electricity market; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Economics; Electricity; Incentive compatibility; Core (optical fiber); Allocative efficiency; Computer science; Incentive; Industrial organization; Game theory; Cournot competition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003255356,0.0001371195,0.0002513476,0.0001221134,0.00006000215,0.00002575874,0.00007380003,0.0001276251,0.000004726754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004877642,0.0001468048,0.00004509466,0.0006736211,0.000008905969,0.00008854081,0.00002454804,0.00009635941,1.465441e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008350096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009544996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001486767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990163,0.00004776963,0.000296275,0.0001953502,0.0001167043,0.0003275785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993783,0.0002634251,0.00006630492,0.00008912935,0.0001312497,0.00007161436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007041846,0.00002695678,0.000223584,0.000193226,0.00001834846,0.000004068044,0.00001911532,0.9950784,0.0005688343,0.001214014,0.0001505524,0.002432444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001135914,0.0001127675,0.0005728255,0.00002409911,0.00001909803,3.249445e-7,0.00004463621,0.9966858,0.0003580559,0.00005756311,0.0008425793,0.000146321],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003576254,0.0005361941,0.9951854,0.00006721811,0.00007134388,0.0002938032,0.000003428217,0.00006321846,0.0002031177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824631,0.00005267936,0.01713028,0.00007320267,0.00009747036,0.00005625422,0.0000319772,0.00003059303,0.00006450514],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5986527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006273033605074385,"score_gpt":0.2384269645813221,"score_spread":0.2321539309762477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}