{"id":"W3098172252","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038505","title":"Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Medicine; Pregnancy; Syphilis; Population; Cost effectiveness; Cohort; Pediatrics; Obstetrics; Family medicine; Environmental health; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060822,0.0002029771,0.0006375692,0.0001690525,0.00007784889,0.0001453809,0.0003964083,0.00006553992,0.00009744122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004168604,0.0001408767,0.0001742284,0.0009348857,0.00002956052,0.000261091,0.0001456217,0.0001588715,0.000004681331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008110001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007129875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004063284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980696,0.0004000698,0.0003808763,0.0005671705,0.0002991792,0.0002831093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986596,0.0005389459,0.0001400732,0.000449829,0.00008244377,0.000129075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002466109,0.0006715592,0.9133374,0.0001127495,0.001025829,0.0007686763,0.004248363,0.006356969,0.00003996766,0.001070487,0.00006838446,0.0698335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008588107,0.001892268,0.9665186,0.001606219,0.0007187601,0.00001747411,0.002845118,0.01624474,0.0008895791,0.0002675998,0.000164991,0.0002464888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484457,0.0005270361,0.003403615,0.00416133,0.0000271492,0.03881533,0.0000765095,0.00003159221,0.004511688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889748,0.0000240973,0.0008999545,0.0009604701,0.00008125052,0.008804095,0.0002035354,0.00002213688,0.00002962301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06958701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2582421120649047,"score_gpt":0.4715757335495271,"score_spread":0.2133336214846224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}