{"id":"W3102010362","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-09597","title":"An improved approach to fracture toughness assessment of brittle coating on ductile substrate systems under indentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Advanced materials and composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; OeAD-GmbH","keywords":"Indentation; Brittleness; Brittle fracture; Materials science; Coating; Composite material; Fracture toughness; Toughness; Substrate (aquarium); Forensic engineering; Fracture (geology); Engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007721195,0.000250345,0.0003316268,0.00009308615,0.00004738842,0.0001159558,0.0001510493,0.0002902753,0.0000301642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002975854,0.0002358052,0.00003751502,0.00008896219,0.000005015358,0.0001514006,0.000005127844,0.0002723585,0.000002599517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005037741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002827462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001612793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001097556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990204,0.00001957012,0.0003479318,0.000255861,0.000191015,0.0001651978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994141,0.00002257761,0.000135984,0.0002562217,0.0001050705,0.00006600391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001501891,0.000058126,0.00001666469,0.0005006957,0.00002623904,2.416359e-7,0.0002266282,0.3081474,0.6900479,0.000716833,0.00002302053,0.0002212107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005455922,0.0002594004,0.02396421,0.0003194568,0.00009146459,0.000004550921,0.008550955,0.1046713,0.8602393,0.0002402851,0.0001082861,0.001005146],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461252,0.00002947779,0.04330175,0.000001923134,0.001533712,0.0005412184,0.00002840922,0.0001692733,0.008269049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919375,0.000005171494,0.005702209,0.00001438508,0.0001925337,0.0001271678,0.001572647,0.0000716748,0.0003767301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2034761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9615857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008374391771826122,"score_gpt":0.2762881551035635,"score_spread":0.2679137633317373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}