{"id":"W3102010362","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-09597","title":"An improved approach to fracture toughness assessment of brittle coating on ductile substrate systems under indentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Advanced materials and composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; OeAD-GmbH","keywords":"Indentation; Brittleness; Brittle fracture; Materials science; Coating; Composite material; Fracture toughness; Toughness; Substrate (aquarium); Forensic engineering; Fracture (geology); Engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005139675,0.0006486578,0.0005818434,0.001285913,0.0003764729,0.0005113103,0.0009956189,0.0007768642,0.00203065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009634812,0.0004614167,0.0003499961,0.000682157,0.0003565134,0.0006830003,0.0005879471,0.0008829003,0.0004777172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004987141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003494289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00622103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992342,0.00004710011,0.00003355234,0.0001172028,0.0005194635,0.00004847303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993528,0.0001752145,0.00005406322,0.0001063399,0.0002927171,0.00001890831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003971318,0.00004181328,0.0006561349,0.0001514561,0.00001501341,0.00008290589,0.0001011846,0.009623555,0.9579815,0.0005795644,0.0001298591,0.03059732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007689513,0.0001684654,0.008239576,0.0000197608,0.00002367889,0.0002763605,0.00008396951,0.3037484,0.6846952,0.0004673619,0.002209757,0.00005975116],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2383522,0.001204477,0.752614,0.00007612618,0.00008286422,0.0003594926,0.0006107534,0.001299439,0.005400673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7335619,0.001016764,0.2593981,0.00004755162,0.00002325125,0.0002499975,0.0003642675,0.000129455,0.005208681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006793141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008374391771826122,"score_gpt":0.2762881551035635,"score_spread":0.2679137633317373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}