{"id":"W3102700966","doi":"10.22230/src.2019v10n1a297","title":"Dissolving Disciplinary Boundaries in “Making Together”: A Recall of the Boundary-Object Methodological Power","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary object; Discipline; Boundary (topology); Articulation (sociology); Object (grammar); Bridge (graph theory); Power (physics); Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007778191,0.00007160722,0.0001261118,0.0001301547,0.0004343122,0.0006198268,0.0005237415,0.0001014098,0.00009995898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002192637,0.00005131948,0.00003133677,0.0004929967,0.0003310487,0.001076002,0.0003457794,0.001316141,0.00001512081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007711731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001116808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004589332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000904286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969447,0.002199285,0.0002115847,0.0001233686,0.000324469,0.0001966196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997142,0.001912293,0.00004233624,0.0007021495,0.0001680063,0.00003328544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001170258,0.001037012,0.2885467,0.001255465,0.0003153328,0.00000669188,0.1873187,0.001384367,0.2475236,0.1280669,0.004320804,0.1390543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007377986,0.0002216885,0.7777147,0.0009004934,0.00001420061,0.000023554,0.0138165,0.002925014,0.003384971,0.04543415,0.1544569,0.0003700769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649012,0.005419346,0.000319926,0.003408526,0.0002021751,0.0003794036,0.000002157025,0.00003552313,0.02533175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996352,0.0005016858,0.002755778,0.00003286683,0.00000881504,0.00002188476,0.000002484321,0.00001165904,0.0003128103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.489168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5977004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1513130701225478,"score_gpt":0.4318308262097003,"score_spread":0.2805177560871525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}