{"id":"W3105792788","doi":"10.1177/1556264620970802","title":"Ethical Reflections on the Conduct of HIV Research with Community Members: A Case Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Citizen journalism; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Public relations; Ethical issues; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4273726,0.0004300206,0.00142076,0.002840697,0.006642312,0.0004769505,0.003616511,0.002599989,0.0008693314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5807747,0.0002473314,0.0004928703,0.008761399,0.01568866,0.0001999414,0.00236717,0.2865118,0.0001929115],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001340897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01699987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001868525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004815274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8364685,0.1142256,0.002604558,0.001069455,0.04303986,0.002592068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4085029,0.5305518,0.0004465454,0.003204312,0.05407038,0.003224095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07279719,0.04676266,0.01355467,0.00605332,0.003582928,0.09600151,0.2833018,0.000297365,0.01485025,0.2596217,0.2022151,0.0009615541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0107551,0.2857002,0.004058671,0.006791526,0.0001461936,0.002920226,0.5726988,0.0002504875,0.005096456,0.08830974,0.02265967,0.0006129413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6633851,0.0000760941,0.00001717043,0.3182747,0.00004368966,0.002066777,0.00001595933,0.00002495269,0.01609551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922501,0.0005324919,0.000349477,0.004356063,0.0009154245,0.0001140495,0.000004036641,0.0001294402,0.001348919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4279656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9891427057106205,"score_gpt":0.8229171006368751,"score_spread":0.1662256050737454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}