{"id":"W3107414365","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering 'Whiteness as Property': Bad Property for Personhood and Affirmative Action Rhetoric","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Rhetoric; Affirmative action; Property (philosophy); Critical legal studies; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Critical race theory; Law; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics; Legal realism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000931663,0.0001535591,0.0002080779,0.00007228422,0.001241421,0.0001890245,0.0001487546,0.00003594642,0.0000471638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001055751,0.00008296339,0.0000746426,0.00003128153,0.0001018408,0.0003640545,0.00004311209,0.0005616142,0.0000213021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002694499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003153555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006965583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001411992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985875,0.0001153921,0.0002280203,0.0001582392,0.0001316347,0.0007792423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993166,0.00008739944,0.0001693851,0.0001429494,0.0002331442,0.00005047779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001720828,0.0001093589,0.0001972267,0.00005200002,0.0004491286,3.142603e-7,0.06023185,0.000006108305,0.0001343595,0.5318618,0.001771871,0.4050139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101306,0.0009195408,0.00006591895,0.0000711138,0.00009025417,0.0002420223,0.1024609,0.0005413303,0.0000849711,0.09614648,0.7979167,0.000359534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6929473,0.02763405,0.02612085,0.04446249,0.004388012,0.002849638,0.00001607847,0.0005937198,0.2009879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575273,0.004372776,0.00007417025,0.0001274169,0.0007061877,0.00006193365,0.000001913353,0.00002276792,0.03710549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7961448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9548134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08057551181221081,"score_gpt":0.2628285142448446,"score_spread":0.1822530024326338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}