{"id":"W3107414365","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering 'Whiteness as Property': Bad Property for Personhood and Affirmative Action Rhetoric","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Rhetoric; Affirmative action; Property (philosophy); Critical legal studies; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Critical race theory; Law; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics; Legal realism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01906126,0.000516002,0.0006668913,0.002166959,0.0126034,0.01676501,0.001562236,0.006897094,0.003961619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692776,0.0003102121,0.0004674205,0.001516226,0.05411023,0.02605521,0.00642286,0.01090962,0.0004906101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009106466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005425132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007375434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008572106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897187,0.007296151,0.0001956851,0.000563167,0.001532052,0.0006942688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821409,0.01499523,0.000755976,0.0004450921,0.001220973,0.0004417973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001847111,0.000009358713,0.0001132663,0.00007111038,0.000004179429,0.00008437314,0.08043312,0.00003841847,0.0001182308,0.9029053,0.01017194,0.00603218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002556988,0.0000428886,0.0006263581,0.0009934319,0.00002569592,0.0001543515,0.127114,0.0002870603,0.0007976602,0.4754821,0.3944109,0.0000398959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05885389,0.03134637,0.00901335,0.6161273,0.006141883,0.00003837913,0.00003700698,0.00006106769,0.2783808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231338,0.006702836,0.001712578,0.04834271,0.002853771,0.0000613095,0.00001760666,0.0001089553,0.01706652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01906126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1008068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08057551181221081,"score_gpt":0.2628285142448446,"score_spread":0.1822530024326338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}