{"id":"W3109417050","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108871","title":"Long-term effectiveness of Natura 2000 network to protect biodiversity: A hint of optimism for common birds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Natura 2000; Biodiversity; Geography; Habitat; Bird conservation; Ecology; Conservation biology; Population decline; Land management; Habitat destruction; Common species; Environmental resource management; Land use; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819193,0.00006884719,0.0001820462,0.000008363884,0.00007815701,0.000002414669,0.0001024414,0.00009080613,0.00004591875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002315951,0.00005326782,0.00004643788,0.000173792,0.0001405535,0.00003476279,0.000119081,0.00005108837,0.00001307579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006708154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000388505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004326286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994106,0.0001184821,0.0001504311,0.0001648532,0.00005391481,0.0001016982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.0003246899,0.00009890079,0.00005471529,0.00003463354,0.00003347009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004714066,0.00003667249,0.9852623,0.00005216722,0.00002105829,5.755385e-7,0.00009593951,0.001752932,0.01121023,0.0003093717,0.0001932115,0.00059411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812206,0.0006724161,0.9954834,0.00001614195,0.00001023539,2.494627e-7,0.0000086885,0.001133917,0.001666333,0.0005817341,0.0000777133,0.00006797614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914877,0.00003449913,0.006056088,0.001483181,0.0000425735,0.0007765483,0.00002095761,0.00001963609,0.00007884346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957311,0.000009592921,0.003040754,0.001130956,0.000008849464,0.00004759989,0.00002556448,0.000001608368,0.000004037442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03901468404880723,"score_gpt":0.258638390659675,"score_spread":0.2196237066108678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}