{"id":"W3109618862","doi":"10.3138/seminar.56.3-4.01","title":"Risking Representation: Abstraction, Affect, and the Documentary Mode in Birgit Weyhe’s <i>Madgermanes</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Comics and Graphic Narratives","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Documentary film; Style (visual arts); Mode (computer interface); Affect (linguistics); Recall; Abstraction; Documentary evidence; Colonialism; Visual language; Sociology; Visual arts; History; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Media studies; Epistemology; Computer science; Communication; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001552045,0.0004592481,0.0001500167,0.0007875991,0.005865144,0.007716263,0.0003952184,0.001384127,0.003103792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002552891,0.0001801537,0.0001302249,0.0005753466,0.01908848,0.003905801,0.003607603,0.002385817,0.0002973166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00447851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008019606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009453496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01198608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986694,0.0008491802,0.0000234747,0.00008668532,0.0001854048,0.0001859636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.0004532432,0.0001274462,0.00007468616,0.00006370457,0.00006943342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005405497,0.00002253592,0.0008906148,0.00004024463,0.000005066634,0.0004800528,0.5536727,0.0001526126,0.001302744,0.4259844,0.005059269,0.01233569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003456769,0.00007799716,0.005235977,0.000256202,0.0000201506,0.001212822,0.3882739,0.0007549131,0.002122432,0.06319177,0.5387477,0.00007173124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5491008,0.003642792,0.007539824,0.02229659,0.0004358317,0.0000363094,0.00005541572,0.0001316899,0.4167609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869664,0.000214113,0.0004714568,0.0003630563,0.00003232305,0.000006977868,0.000007170973,0.00002514793,0.0119133],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009453496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03249407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05611307525543774,"score_gpt":0.320208493058155,"score_spread":0.2640954178027173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}