{"id":"W3110330489","doi":"10.1111/joes.12420","title":"GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Citation impact; Web of science; Cover (algebra); Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Political science; Economics; MEDLINE; Management; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.130262,0.0001587522,0.0006357298,0.05908157,0.0001021147,0.001629192,0.001421753,0.0001902458,0.000094624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005097585,0.0001310932,0.0001288749,0.01026499,0.0001465701,0.0005573259,0.00568557,0.001074761,0.00002267439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001181765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004683262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001238143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007978061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936968,0.002126639,0.001416942,0.0007350981,0.00156248,0.000462037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935436,0.00449888,0.0006607745,0.0003317846,0.0005712642,0.0003936796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006009625,0.00004632764,0.9254656,0.00001973579,0.00005237784,0.00005511674,0.0004896845,0.004013928,0.000002281432,0.0002186184,0.001383694,0.06819251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007355822,0.00009794666,0.9291064,0.00001840672,0.000003421937,0.000008409291,0.0007743296,0.01057479,0.000003095379,0.05833065,0.0002313302,0.0001156222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953422,0.0009037504,0.0001917859,0.0006687744,0.0004744666,0.0002559654,0.00004292417,0.000001274389,0.002118865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832572,0.01619138,0.0003851661,0.00001836437,0.00007626088,0.000001783296,0.000002346732,0.000008260431,0.00005925045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1251644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8358293631396622,"score_gpt":0.6066546507714353,"score_spread":0.2291747123682268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}