{"id":"W3111013980","doi":"10.1142/s021951942040031x","title":"DEVELOPMENT OF THE USABILITY SCALE FOR POWER WHEELCHAIRS AND ITS APPLICATION IN POWER WHEELCHAIRS USERS IN KOREA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Usability; Operability; Cronbach's alpha; Scale (ratio); Reliability (semiconductor); System usability scale; Power (physics); Computer science; Service (business); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Human–computer interaction; Heuristic evaluation; World Wide Web; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002888403,0.00008554567,0.0003875301,0.0001247802,0.00007333365,4.308295e-7,0.0002368086,0.000252643,0.00001744944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212324,0.00005287588,0.00002287187,0.000226432,0.0001192667,0.00002987944,0.0001676,0.0006592016,2.781787e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001001422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001846936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998377,0.0003293803,0.0009160239,0.0001510971,0.00006991166,0.0001566262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998677,0.0004997391,0.0004602538,0.0001604444,0.0001496108,0.00005299545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000713562,0.0002630529,0.90171,0.0002862675,0.00002604326,8.778502e-7,0.02175101,0.000003103086,0.04346725,0.02203716,0.000340788,0.009400886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01213844,0.001782041,0.8355716,0.001340241,0.00004427882,0.00001401411,0.07851104,0.002680521,0.002240332,0.03519779,0.03012759,0.0003520881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970541,0.0005175481,0.002822942,0.02524674,0.0001427736,0.0006215579,0.0000037209,0.0000043915,0.00009932237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968703,0.000307785,0.001617223,0.001140394,0.00001587174,0.00003953107,0.000001509628,0.000004342579,0.000003021886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06613838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2863939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.107550289834185,"score_gpt":0.4229371782830677,"score_spread":0.3153868884488827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}