{"id":"W3111640515","doi":"10.1093/isr/viaa082","title":"Engaging the “Animal Question” in International Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Review","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Anthropocentrism; International relations theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; International relations; Human animal; Human relations; Field (mathematics); Neglect; Relation (database); Subject (documents); Subject matter; Epistemology; Raising (metalworking); Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Philosophy; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008007395,0.0001180205,0.0001909184,0.00009075922,0.00050943,0.00008721208,0.0007098717,0.00002993647,0.003070239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004149667,0.0000946564,0.0001475151,0.0004175096,0.0002854999,0.0004203808,0.0001981139,0.0003439077,0.0005847272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002159789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000466345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005007234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004375936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983224,0.0002656211,0.0004386708,0.000242061,0.0005486014,0.0001826428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987842,0.0004667758,0.0001667049,0.000098993,0.00042241,0.00006087233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005750159,0.0001950405,0.02993941,0.0001789866,0.001018317,0.00004579639,0.0372463,0.0001498048,0.00004642604,0.4729079,0.4384128,0.01980174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001243069,0.00001811213,0.01010165,0.0005583591,0.0000320973,0.000002733976,0.0105953,0.00007342996,0.000001625484,0.0009837092,0.9773867,0.000122019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003316619,0.08323436,0.00002293325,0.6708361,0.001766073,0.0005693789,0.00001810439,0.0001254065,0.2401111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575459,0.1301045,0.0002836046,0.009417332,0.0008009988,0.0001435436,0.00001387231,0.00001098819,0.001679344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1074254181272407,"score_gpt":0.4364114203339444,"score_spread":0.3289860022067037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}