{"id":"W3112319432","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms and Bureaucratic Inertia: A Case Study of Work Safety Regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Bureaucracy; Work (physics); Political science; Abuse of power; Authoritarianism; China; Power (physics); Administrative law; Law and economics; State (computer science); Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law; Economics; Democracy; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006935435,0.0001827095,0.0005594663,0.00006445753,0.000409749,0.00003341158,0.0003839298,0.0002153573,0.0001385418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000221746,0.0001453117,0.0001569258,0.00007146635,0.0004983281,0.0005007003,0.0001417812,0.0001709478,4.362436e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001695383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002143465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1032762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07407263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989179,0.00006650317,0.0003256655,0.0002723219,0.0002707188,0.0001469354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998374,0.0002036514,0.0008720164,0.0003126257,0.0001664373,0.00007124688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002844673,0.001092046,0.1893598,0.001367059,0.003195434,0.0002143904,0.5385879,0.000909513,0.0002237711,0.125552,0.001112379,0.1355411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006255315,0.001501141,0.792233,0.0009616824,0.001261502,0.00005761476,0.1155372,0.0006704941,0.000009804534,0.0781775,0.002086571,0.001248111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865522,0.0003811771,0.0001153543,0.0001770752,0.00006702218,0.0006433091,0.00005369127,0.000006333526,0.01200383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798574,0.0007816286,0.00004483172,0.000001868658,0.0000225881,2.112018e-7,0.000003128412,0.000009756175,0.01927858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6028732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9428231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02821086827907032,"score_gpt":0.285192649958903,"score_spread":0.2569817816798327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}