{"id":"W3113052513","doi":"10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280","title":"Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide<i>Leuciscus idus</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Aecom (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Generalist and specialist species; Leuciscus; Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Habitat; Fishery; Fish migration; Brackish water; Range (aeronautics); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Salinity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001180894,0.0001906607,0.00108961,0.00002635835,0.0002772715,0.00001474383,0.0007190407,0.00004567782,0.0005334608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283818,0.00008587396,0.0002686203,0.001324088,0.003522812,0.0002147998,0.001442825,0.0001499352,0.00000484238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002532831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007571736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005168389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005794979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983203,0.0002775614,0.000498777,0.0004675684,0.0002193403,0.0002163855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991969,0.00005405047,0.0003660709,0.000328005,0.000008037235,0.00004687498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004417615,0.0002793603,0.9185956,0.00195628,0.01225365,0.000006665313,0.009684781,0.0002134018,0.01243665,0.001443366,0.03932624,0.003759868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003289026,0.0001766849,0.7287211,0.00005788471,0.08748329,0.000007815776,0.001121083,0.00005487623,0.000396458,0.0003749566,0.18085,0.000426945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3619064,0.4582458,0.000112878,0.1656898,0.0002087729,0.007145928,0.0002457717,0.00003282836,0.006411729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8362833,0.1446002,0.0002124778,0.01866068,0.000006177673,0.000118532,0.00000330441,0.000005207,0.0001101293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4743769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04569230808785801,"score_gpt":0.2647173663506411,"score_spread":0.2190250582627831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}