{"id":"W3113091345","doi":"10.1080/19648189.2020.1847691","title":"Durability performance evaluation of green geopolymer concrete","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Carbonation; Sorptivity; Waterproofing; Ground granulated blast-furnace slag; Cementitious; Efflorescence; Shrinkage; Materials science; Construction engineering; Forensic engineering; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Cement; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000710254,0.0004431283,0.0003829614,0.0008604234,0.0002661275,0.0003766994,0.0003474932,0.0004820762,0.001836108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007135529,0.0001804389,0.0003966599,0.0005458286,0.0001894298,0.0006068156,0.0003652265,0.0004724156,0.0005304248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003227644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002883152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008826741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002632046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990188,0.00008085656,0.00005580164,0.0000978231,0.0006770159,0.00006967426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994676,0.00008928904,0.00009179854,0.00004706431,0.0002539514,0.00005051441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004073072,0.0001182776,0.005343424,0.00078538,0.00004251133,0.0002081296,0.000240122,0.004794849,0.9429178,0.0004514928,0.0004856657,0.044205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005887781,0.001366962,0.009201813,0.00004587799,0.00006019034,0.000228424,0.0001559612,0.005663761,0.9784516,0.0001483837,0.004636634,0.00003453673],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771811,0.008657248,0.007526897,0.000083049,0.0001250606,0.00004082067,0.0004880368,0.0001296179,0.005768236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930224,0.001719538,0.001530161,0.00002181045,0.00001243062,0.00001049344,0.0002295858,0.00002696447,0.003426598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001836108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006142437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0160588290519667,"score_gpt":0.1876571424275641,"score_spread":0.1715983133755974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}