{"id":"W3113442200","doi":"10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100051","title":"Explication of hydrophobic silica as effective pore former for membrane fabrication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Surface Science Advances","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Universiti Teknologi Petronas; Ministry of Higher Education","keywords":"Hydrophobic silica; Membrane; Contact angle; Chemical engineering; Hydrophobe; Filtration (mathematics); Permeance; Materials science; Hydrophobic effect; Chemistry; Chromatography; Polymer chemistry; Organic chemistry; Permeation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003483976,0.0001448501,0.0001936887,0.00003665514,0.0002267421,0.00002219077,0.0006414861,0.00005110709,0.0001348082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002247186,0.0001287661,0.00004094749,0.001241942,0.0009790293,0.0007536176,0.0001390299,0.00007287148,0.0002143632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008482578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003050406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001650194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004892835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983401,0.00001145338,0.0002627629,0.0006103182,0.0004898384,0.0002855411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999148,0.000139742,0.00024636,0.0003266865,0.00004434541,0.00009493239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000453527,0.00002261122,0.0005656552,0.00002187388,0.000001889644,6.817398e-8,0.0004468473,0.01735674,0.9674864,0.001211582,0.00006515078,0.01277577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002307036,0.0001527358,0.001885766,0.00000341381,0.00000691274,6.337117e-7,0.0004298128,0.002529897,0.9853427,0.002559797,0.006703384,0.0001542718],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799914,0.00006678999,0.004107482,0.0008019448,0.00004621024,0.001453283,0.000006549259,0.0001464521,0.01337984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888998,0.00004687019,0.01045562,0.0003123364,0.00001126052,0.0002074995,0.000008792483,0.00001003111,0.00004780203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01785621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.525093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055503869805922,"score_gpt":0.2642024743884081,"score_spread":0.2536474356903489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}