{"id":"W3114403312","doi":"10.1177/2158244020983007","title":"Debating Extractivism: Stakeholder Communications in British Columbia’s Liquefied Natural Gas Controversy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Ideology; Civil society; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liquefied natural gas; Political economy; Stakeholder; Natural resource; Corporate governance; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Law; Natural gas","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000149864,0.00008860754,0.0001732744,0.000001282676,0.0001627519,0.0003267688,0.0009236117,0.0000528766,0.002092205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005446413,0.0001395966,0.00003272436,0.0001632996,0.0001854996,0.0005644416,0.001320884,0.0002951807,0.0001041073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002141397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001129197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05363756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1325295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989815,0.00008424173,0.0002142473,0.000302173,0.0001662167,0.0002516309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994004,0.00006263358,0.00008681734,0.0003364898,0.000001565336,0.0001120594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000404002,0.0003167833,0.7351103,0.000009169299,0.0000278381,0.0001156361,0.001864303,0.005238922,0.00535067,0.00001796346,0.004817087,0.2470909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002442822,0.0001308172,0.8969293,0.00007111095,0.00002285329,0.00002768268,0.003415612,0.06716499,0.00002902852,0.0003985283,0.02873456,0.0006327485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691908,0.0001327888,0.000978223,0.001592467,0.00004375113,0.0007113578,0.000008257639,0.0000364946,0.02730589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785165,0.0001294433,0.01611241,0.00241783,0.00001190594,0.00004151861,0.0000153305,0.00002158815,0.002733434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2464582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03225963626547518,"score_gpt":0.2466646616597424,"score_spread":0.2144050253942673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}