{"id":"W3115247823","doi":"10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8","title":"Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Public health; Health care; Population health; Accountability; Global health; Population; Thematic analysis; Information ethics; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Nursing; Environmental health; Law; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04358689,0.001401141,0.003549371,0.03601178,0.002979438,0.008388644,0.002271324,0.005650079,0.004720188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1720399,0.001362409,0.003441474,0.03011705,0.004878153,0.009075654,0.005117246,0.003945909,0.0008034498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01061361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03688405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00619942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01211248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9571847,0.02281604,0.01092856,0.001355296,0.006873357,0.0008420505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7390693,0.2284436,0.01280423,0.002311731,0.01626167,0.001109397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009719936,0.00006792155,0.001194413,0.5891956,0.0008454357,0.0006610912,0.009030417,0.0005584746,0.000220108,0.0248425,0.0252123,0.3480745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001465163,0.00002769145,0.0007850103,0.9187287,0.0005806189,0.0003287753,0.002746379,0.00009537198,0.00006714078,0.004559562,0.07204156,0.00002441058],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006303798,0.9909038,0.000582732,0.004994315,0.000456375,0.0002557752,0.00009113739,0.000006674164,0.002078911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007519158,0.9879479,0.001392998,0.001888093,0.0002884398,0.000646809,0.0001090153,0.000008287152,0.0001993037],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04358689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2305123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7005869209800488,"score_gpt":0.6332030274145729,"score_spread":0.06738389356547592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}