{"id":"W3115597134","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144288","title":"Group versus individual exposure: Do methodological decisions in aquatic toxicology alter experimental results?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Daphnia magna; Toxicology; Toxicity; Environmental toxicology; Daphnia; Biology; Organism; Ecotoxicology; Aquatic toxicology; Confounding; Environmental health; Zoology; Medicine; Genetics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1309246,0.0009391785,0.001918754,0.001242938,0.00204417,0.001603133,0.002650737,0.003421753,0.003028386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2377431,0.0008602127,0.001810484,0.001277743,0.004581558,0.002701142,0.002188953,0.002593758,0.0007469314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001133994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001623627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00187853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005394147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8023464,0.1529061,0.01388926,0.01196988,0.01749863,0.001389595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7959964,0.1242559,0.0217659,0.04369858,0.01256481,0.001718418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05431747,0.01130746,0.1446398,0.009934591,0.01941441,0.0007558878,0.009560763,0.00508136,0.1496705,0.04064295,0.01646263,0.5382122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01356858,0.04840359,0.4216492,0.005381812,0.02237104,0.002189286,0.004366231,0.01916181,0.1784682,0.2137931,0.06958769,0.001059497],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4957184,0.01527884,0.4289383,0.01724661,0.01083837,0.009065909,0.001518947,0.000806689,0.02058783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7620461,0.00336468,0.2070362,0.01216986,0.001887673,0.008512627,0.0004920873,0.0008014361,0.003689286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09536285762307926,"score_gpt":0.3075276121839281,"score_spread":0.2121647545608488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}