{"id":"W3118469810","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14010027","title":"Intellectual Capital and Bank Risk in Vietnam—A Quantile Regression Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Quantile regression; Intellectual capital; Risk-adjusted return on capital; Economics; Capital adequacy ratio; Insolvency; Economic capital; Vietnamese; Human capital; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Value at risk; Capital (architecture); Financial capital; Finance; Risk management; Capital formation; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001549305,0.0002126528,0.0002297802,0.001078791,0.00024205,0.0008780407,0.0003687708,0.0002542262,0.002910656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005656648,0.0001207403,0.0005261109,0.001171767,0.0003127261,0.000521644,0.0005509862,0.0007310249,0.0002523435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007267243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004915417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03866447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01355821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993706,0.0002698223,0.00002744285,0.0001382966,0.00007378952,0.0001201485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971974,0.001490933,0.0006140201,0.0002681199,0.0002588764,0.0001705915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006737788,0.00006022695,0.972324,0.00002352171,0.0001572399,0.000199683,0.0005137141,0.009180549,0.0001849106,0.001964432,0.0007198313,0.01460451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005771177,0.00007676154,0.9239233,0.00003835247,0.00006659466,0.0001533512,0.00122763,0.06998306,0.0004018118,0.002084436,0.002022196,0.00001678846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921364,0.0003360258,0.004394369,0.000259616,0.0000109998,0.00001767891,0.001020781,0.00003742061,0.001786732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987956,0.00005888371,0.0002572234,0.00001145306,0.000004685804,0.000007230538,0.0003677034,0.000003499025,0.0004936911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03866447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07687885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009139297360903829,"score_gpt":0.2045749856941488,"score_spread":0.1954356883332449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}