{"id":"W3118614128","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2020.1865788","title":"Deriving predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) using a novel assessment factor method","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Extrapolation; Transparency (behavior); Consistency (knowledge bases); Risk assessment; Factor analysis; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Environmental science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007347696,0.0002379405,0.0002917818,0.00005936677,0.001065998,0.0003449803,0.0003392763,0.0002160784,0.02500355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001429472,0.000203053,0.0001201442,0.00009120781,0.0002517522,0.0007142018,0.0004220308,0.0007917997,0.0000349375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007675331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005752053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001498167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009563172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975533,0.0006207945,0.000469353,0.0004929488,0.0004574359,0.0004061044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988834,0.0002930193,0.0003224495,0.0001490383,0.00004331505,0.0003087855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002375493,0.0009845733,0.7385045,0.000002243215,0.0001404612,0.0001384201,0.0000822721,0.002953927,0.2547914,0.0007246993,0.000161176,0.001492554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001502201,0.0008264703,0.9576216,0.00001259495,0.00007086714,0.0005253439,0.0001492785,0.03365953,0.001105619,0.001044633,0.003213568,0.000268313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560456,0.000006950345,0.0365333,0.0002012476,0.0007748579,0.0001901375,0.00006193315,0.00003516153,0.006150779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042906,0.0001109537,0.09419203,0.0006556217,0.0003026306,0.00002277841,0.00006300361,0.00001457975,0.0003478596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2536858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9758877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03426666002211963,"score_gpt":0.381767403402524,"score_spread":0.3475007433804043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}