{"id":"W3119201018","doi":"10.1177/1024258920981827","title":"Understanding the dynamics of inequity in collective bargaining: evidence from Australia, Canada, Denmark and France","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transfer European Review of Labour and Research","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Bargaining power; Assertion; Core (optical fiber); Normative; Work (physics); Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00340164,0.0000618034,0.0002039195,0.00003361764,0.0002872703,0.00002939363,0.0001964229,0.00002029916,0.0002238404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004997525,0.00004371655,0.00002219389,0.0007894571,0.0004434045,0.00007261259,0.00005757925,0.0002485329,2.091982e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007663747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.407506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8011824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997035,0.001815168,0.0002473113,0.0001743166,0.0005099433,0.0002182616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987912,0.0007113245,0.00002196664,0.0001361952,0.000264007,0.00007533601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006062884,0.0001609556,0.1704592,0.003627359,0.0001513585,0.0001831892,0.04942434,0.00000781128,0.001303151,0.7646244,0.001221556,0.008776037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161699,0.00006426552,0.9656199,0.00988273,0.00002879954,7.043532e-7,0.009979247,0.00002223238,0.0001610857,0.002869495,0.01081037,0.0001449999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293589,0.05640284,0.0002686503,0.005938133,0.0000433015,0.0003920168,0.0001420516,0.000002417162,0.007451713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.886332,0.1111837,0.0000202891,0.0001902288,0.00001722093,0.000002007301,0.000001828596,0.000005078081,0.002247688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7951607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2149481115568674,"score_gpt":0.4015549306173665,"score_spread":0.1866068190604991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}