{"id":"W3119505789","doi":"10.21248/zaspil.60.2018.475","title":"processing cost of Downward Entailingness: the representation and verification of comparative constructions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ZAS Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Quantifier (linguistics); Computer science; Representation (politics); Monotonic function; Negation; Semantics (computer science); Process (computing); Theoretical computer science; Point (geometry); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01350093,0.0007012873,0.0007249173,0.001596022,0.001134382,0.004714615,0.002100457,0.001701781,0.01530222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09347602,0.0007246811,0.0009644423,0.001324993,0.006243025,0.0196938,0.004718552,0.002679117,0.0005560459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001005766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009400783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006426255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903016,0.004838457,0.0006455046,0.001714597,0.002149838,0.0003500205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8929604,0.07351986,0.007263026,0.02196364,0.003730579,0.0005623806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001124192,0.0002915351,0.009974579,0.0009860925,0.0001205983,0.000258713,0.006067448,0.007971628,0.04758709,0.8196639,0.001447554,0.1045066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001101667,0.0005140823,0.01963618,0.0001521508,0.0001390784,0.0006390019,0.001684696,0.0647599,0.07356348,0.8299433,0.00869098,0.0001669476],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4702647,0.0007083103,0.5012019,0.002444387,0.0001275993,0.0002145741,0.0005512544,0.0008526076,0.02363467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204378,0.0001514281,0.07719828,0.0001616096,0.00004025691,0.0001744475,0.0003046366,0.0002067683,0.001324674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07140058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02808243805788615,"score_gpt":0.3413883978666717,"score_spread":0.3133059598087856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}