{"id":"W3121207479","doi":"10.1093/pan/mpn007","title":"Lexical Cohesion Analysis of Political Speech","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Analysis","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Rhetorical question; Computer science; Linguistics; Annotation; Natural language processing; Lexical density; Representation (politics); Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Lexical item; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359995,0.0003236901,0.0004658368,0.007816614,0.001374797,0.002102222,0.0005943003,0.0004351572,0.002667579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01328195,0.0002421525,0.0003403992,0.003498051,0.001031671,0.002492622,0.001382025,0.0006511183,0.0006850678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005614391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006289317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001284657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00158943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975199,0.001056623,0.0001820301,0.0004810983,0.0006519725,0.0001083095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899714,0.006484689,0.001302304,0.0006411591,0.001457345,0.0001431457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000645727,0.0001575815,0.0316761,0.001569755,0.0002234356,0.001058562,0.03187554,0.006086305,0.1419327,0.08701584,0.009741051,0.6880173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552343,0.0004701508,0.2110816,0.0006116618,0.0004626092,0.002241687,0.02651807,0.2729709,0.1409168,0.1802629,0.163859,0.0004493843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4091617,0.001421673,0.5642508,0.0006514519,0.0001958388,0.0003916194,0.002120126,0.002049459,0.01975734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8546861,0.0002940116,0.1404442,0.00005241919,0.0001406548,0.0002888964,0.001695412,0.0002859964,0.002112255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007816614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008923948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02193931203427257,"score_gpt":0.3055167210051506,"score_spread":0.283577408970878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}