{"id":"W3121300722","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL AND COMMON LAW DIALOGUES BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT AND CANADIAN LEGISLATURE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Legislature; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009042087,0.0001299567,0.0002493623,0.0000123434,0.003814529,0.0001435078,0.0002760829,0.00008359834,0.0001478259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000178823,0.00007002367,0.00004423684,0.0001537011,0.003008918,0.00011211,0.00002912122,0.0002423202,0.00003838795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004971377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987667,0.0003057374,0.0001462895,0.0001496632,0.0002009281,0.0004307053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989689,0.0002035703,0.00004384549,0.0001472628,0.00007660873,0.000559793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.171899e-7,0.00000176443,0.05565234,0.00007828718,0.00008577967,0.00002122713,0.005411149,2.593829e-7,2.25052e-7,0.8771867,0.05104803,0.01051345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004564429,0.000004217931,0.03844628,0.0002082025,0.00007073038,0.000007570272,0.0002875736,3.769526e-7,7.795072e-8,0.001058125,0.9597644,0.0001067794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01022783,0.223398,3.145939e-7,0.6208518,0.0001906301,0.00122759,0.0002140219,0.00002631233,0.1438635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284407,0.05871749,0.000008995065,0.01200803,0.0003201556,0.0000197939,0.00002023759,0.000004196282,0.0004604238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9182128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0629178601273308,"score_gpt":0.3049347126187453,"score_spread":0.2420168524914145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}