{"id":"W3121301256","doi":"","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt's Literary Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Harm; Political science; Law; Appeal; Arbitrariness; Empathy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050385,0.001050566,0.001155996,0.003998145,0.0629183,0.01769057,0.00321548,0.01015674,0.004629446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03546874,0.0009134871,0.0008548577,0.003694287,0.01927063,0.004926331,0.01132175,0.01183031,0.0006972838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01659217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006848537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04414979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1217846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795653,0.01168951,0.0006125055,0.001511145,0.003536022,0.003085571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784297,0.01545059,0.001482913,0.0005429893,0.001793197,0.002300661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000387086,0.0001129429,0.002027021,0.00008151841,0.000008747646,0.0233886,0.9330193,0.00008732515,0.0008125383,0.02692645,0.006932079,0.006564729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001773865,0.00008659963,0.002747837,0.0002704779,0.00002245468,0.004043071,0.8725263,0.0003367154,0.0008302879,0.003246102,0.1158175,0.000054822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.835089,0.001936219,0.001829306,0.0190135,0.0007751257,0.0002459186,0.00004880926,0.0000421031,0.14102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719981,0.0008995965,0.001056082,0.004004602,0.0004634808,0.0001089957,0.00003108488,0.00007118894,0.02136672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0629183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1203852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0231016915634527,"score_gpt":0.3237702554661285,"score_spread":0.3006685639026758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}