{"id":"W3121364126","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-51170","title":"“Doing Good Field Research”: Assessing the Quality of Audit Field Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Field (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Trustworthiness; Management science; Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Accounting; Business; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6255043,0.0008641947,0.00193913,0.01337902,0.008047114,0.02008291,0.004417156,0.004593223,0.002062008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8809532,0.001761482,0.001504046,0.008767029,0.017335,0.01555384,0.009602616,0.005773917,0.0007164095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01151239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03073641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002685669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003641059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.218572,0.5565705,0.115283,0.009895495,0.09545474,0.004224237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0360239,0.6415614,0.09919304,0.05085695,0.1638807,0.008483976],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008124281,0.0004427104,0.1636018,0.01838648,0.0009214915,0.0007504193,0.2284474,0.001542469,0.003932807,0.04487433,0.06645588,0.4698319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005027991,0.002651043,0.173839,0.05317137,0.000975027,0.003676721,0.2623294,0.01088423,0.01187286,0.1466499,0.3317541,0.001693502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3299119,0.02070162,0.3343122,0.2265412,0.01138148,0.01471926,0.0009885302,0.002368773,0.05907512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7739437,0.003544516,0.1959666,0.01620345,0.001470613,0.006188175,0.0002890645,0.0005404063,0.001853558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4618199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6326416499878178,"score_gpt":0.7062969212189713,"score_spread":0.07365527123115345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}