{"id":"W3121407407","doi":"","title":"Argument from Analogy in Legal Rhetoric","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Argument map; Argumentation theory; Premise; Persuasion; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Similarity (geometry); Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00160444,0.0001054766,0.0001575223,0.0001208244,0.0003614223,0.0001537785,0.0004292222,0.0001085532,0.001447805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001694742,0.00009993409,0.00007655743,0.0003306656,0.0001645676,0.0005431956,0.00002868677,0.001324324,0.0008110032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002156103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002061078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06935219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1941026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965268,0.0002705084,0.0003370247,0.0001858779,0.0003845943,0.002295186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994305,0.0001159357,0.0001131981,0.0001183517,0.00009280589,0.0001292033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001034065,0.0000796262,0.00879943,3.665928e-7,0.00003368404,0.000006989574,0.003253613,0.00005069413,0.0003119615,0.9311117,0.0003774317,0.05596419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001162594,0.0001040523,0.00164328,0.00001018034,0.000008678599,0.0000108936,0.01835326,0.00009535339,0.0001437486,0.9368006,0.04253366,0.0001800593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653179,0.001295136,0.002964586,0.005555619,0.0009031779,0.0002297066,8.390446e-7,0.00003759404,0.02369544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944735,0.001819352,0.00007875822,0.0001714937,0.0008386784,0.00001157516,0.000001092157,0.000011364,0.002594212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1247504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01698104430135978,"score_gpt":0.3041320417880619,"score_spread":0.2871509974867021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}