{"id":"W3121407407","doi":"","title":"Argument from Analogy in Legal Rhetoric","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Argument map; Argumentation theory; Premise; Persuasion; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Similarity (geometry); Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003158213,0.0005404372,0.000506521,0.002690788,0.002252835,0.004458375,0.001275563,0.002430174,0.004019778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008994019,0.0003891579,0.000954835,0.001373816,0.01100288,0.01284191,0.003224307,0.002373866,0.0006180656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002034982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000997965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007752011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005241343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947148,0.003847699,0.0001607333,0.0002778483,0.0008245172,0.0001744856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953352,0.003406234,0.0003339232,0.0004949396,0.0002971034,0.0001326425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002706525,0.000004580707,0.00007231913,0.00001523499,0.000002275435,0.00004542401,0.0008790321,0.0004566693,0.00005306293,0.9963638,0.0001216289,0.00198331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005969557,0.00001172654,0.0001448812,0.00004344061,0.000005035335,0.0001009108,0.0004210953,0.004569952,0.0002090125,0.9824493,0.01203287,0.000005862923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09562004,0.003527441,0.5579049,0.00861043,0.0003527275,0.0001746199,0.0001214496,0.0002955385,0.3333929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166657,0.0008488191,0.07550999,0.0003940498,0.0001424062,0.0001480941,0.00007904932,0.0000543354,0.006157495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004458375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01670241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01698104430135978,"score_gpt":0.3041320417880619,"score_spread":0.2871509974867021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}