{"id":"W3121427280","doi":"","title":"Board monitoring, audit committee effectiveness, and financial reporting quality: Review and synthesis of empirical evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Agricultural and Financial Auditing","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit committee; Accounting; Audit; Business; Empirical evidence; Audit evidence; Quality audit; Joint audit; Internal audit","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00533079,0.000295955,0.001155784,0.00003565344,0.0002483548,0.00007667141,0.0003570015,0.0003794232,0.00001262642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01101917,0.0001388368,0.0001757352,0.000194883,0.0002747491,0.0001282613,0.000929312,0.0009984345,0.000001011558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001791408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007927972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004532789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002828519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963431,0.0006956652,0.001355292,0.0008547654,0.0002575737,0.0004936355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951847,0.003107236,0.001208178,0.0001722941,0.0001805212,0.0001470709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004005893,0.00006078433,0.1601857,0.00148372,0.0000142096,0.00001515796,0.00003802445,0.000006029645,0.00180824,0.00002520366,0.00004033839,0.8362826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005870197,0.0001329058,0.988887,0.007429612,0.00002771113,0.00001122072,0.0000888363,0.0000107501,0.0006108865,0.0008548196,0.001580939,0.0003066192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882588,0.008293753,1.620447e-7,0.001572035,0.00008909235,0.0006752611,0.00003159319,0.00002491005,0.001054403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896723,0.1095814,0.0001461498,0.00007187176,0.0003497901,0.00012365,0.000007469708,0.000002347099,0.00004493428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8359759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1159787582566412,"score_gpt":0.3698062943379898,"score_spread":0.2538275360813486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}