{"id":"W3121427280","doi":"","title":"Board monitoring, audit committee effectiveness, and financial reporting quality: Review and synthesis of empirical evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Agricultural and Financial Auditing","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit committee; Accounting; Audit; Business; Empirical evidence; Audit evidence; Quality audit; Joint audit; Internal audit","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08033635,0.001117848,0.006936559,0.01008745,0.0005954076,0.005926817,0.002699318,0.003513887,0.002941646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2905954,0.001391091,0.006380477,0.01524615,0.00316535,0.004354503,0.002371755,0.00263139,0.000283516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005205048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01089161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008918074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01698502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9364863,0.02740441,0.0180125,0.005060223,0.01201806,0.001018488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5059637,0.3885994,0.07859141,0.004774619,0.02049341,0.001577335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002913813,0.0001698583,0.03099469,0.5614679,0.04323848,0.0001115131,0.0006935681,0.000832969,0.0002615221,0.001427195,0.01121498,0.3466735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002458755,0.001281756,0.1231707,0.6051354,0.2079622,0.001111635,0.001590366,0.001038359,0.001007809,0.004740869,0.05025755,0.0002445316],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001614108,0.9970667,0.0001377321,0.0007599166,0.00009584132,0.00003398753,0.0001316064,0.000003588435,0.0001565345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05986876,0.9367258,0.00107616,0.001131758,0.0006057586,0.0001433087,0.0003620693,0.0000129186,0.00007348974],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08033635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4248643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1159787582566412,"score_gpt":0.3698062943379898,"score_spread":0.2538275360813486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}