{"id":"W3121507199","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00496.x","title":"Competition for exclusive customers: comparing equilibrium and welfare under one‐part and two‐part pricing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopolization; Economics; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Pricing schedule; Unit (ring theory); Welfare; Competition (biology); Price discrimination; Average cost pricing; Limit price; Rational pricing; Price level; Monopoly; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005327582,0.0007677956,0.002153188,0.001184354,0.001104886,0.004148865,0.002225632,0.002865912,0.01122761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01413576,0.0006219379,0.00170589,0.001224444,0.003634733,0.00427133,0.002584605,0.00206706,0.000585283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003992326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002285808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005058757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003508571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958614,0.00234691,0.00006794812,0.0003381078,0.0003964238,0.0009893451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859007,0.01068791,0.001026353,0.0008381433,0.0005773878,0.0009695225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001973161,0.001672699,0.007915949,0.0003170251,0.0003407885,0.0003697374,0.0003957199,0.2731284,0.003053606,0.6773399,0.004888287,0.02860474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005198614,0.0006690741,0.005485254,0.000077138,0.0001516828,0.0001940577,0.0008320975,0.5117608,0.0008610731,0.4776619,0.001686725,0.0001002554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835958,0.0004353557,0.07266546,0.002573279,0.00005695593,0.0002092549,0.0003628682,0.0001049686,0.03999616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945242,0.0001064569,0.003098458,0.0001297073,0.00001651248,0.00007230377,0.00005400557,0.00001199695,0.001986454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01122761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1693254764179532,"score_gpt":0.1961815268268155,"score_spread":0.02685605040886235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}