{"id":"W3121507199","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00496.x","title":"Competition for exclusive customers: comparing equilibrium and welfare under one‐part and two‐part pricing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopolization; Economics; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Pricing schedule; Unit (ring theory); Welfare; Competition (biology); Price discrimination; Average cost pricing; Limit price; Rational pricing; Price level; Monopoly; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000504056,0.0002566898,0.0009236763,0.0009056365,0.0003570402,0.0001360549,0.0002390207,0.0001194516,0.0004360182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006923558,0.0003623203,0.0002040598,0.0001298623,0.000216988,0.0005047178,0.00003208109,0.0002301132,0.00001409196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006185723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002753029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4292229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997816,0.00002633292,0.001128712,0.0004455998,0.000002441244,0.0005809693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975201,0.00009092203,0.0008202661,0.000259065,0.0001026616,0.001206927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003531167,0.00001338226,0.02239201,0.00005243966,0.0002254039,0.00001953485,0.0006626864,0.004247113,0.000006665833,0.9719675,0.0001808905,0.0001970435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007812517,0.0009628536,0.02231222,0.0004743828,0.0002901918,0.002329327,0.004303867,0.03922113,0.000166617,0.6326469,0.286741,0.002738926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893849,0.001106372,0.000594725,0.003017497,0.0008151586,0.0002301395,0.0002514368,0.000007536099,0.004592276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997288,0.0004701126,0.0005110542,0.0006600341,0.0005482211,0.00001737261,0.00004003275,0.00004454232,0.0004205928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.411206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1693254764179532,"score_gpt":0.1961815268268155,"score_spread":0.02685605040886235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}