{"id":"W3121521915","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.36994","title":"Creating Carbon Offsets in Agriculture through No-Till Cultivation: A Meta-Analysis of Costs and Carbon Benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Carbon offset; Tillage; Carbon credit; Soil carbon; No-till farming; Agriculture; Carbon fibers; Carbon sequestration; Carbon sink; Environmental science; Carbon accounting; Greenhouse gas; Natural resource economics; Yield (engineering); Fossil fuel; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Carbon dioxide; Agricultural economics; Soil water; Agronomy; Economics; Mathematics; Ecology; Soil science; Engineering; Climate change; Waste management; Soil fertility","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02125529,0.002275365,0.007337997,0.003229577,0.0004037503,0.002197654,0.001645854,0.001837588,0.003640749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0344939,0.001230869,0.03704102,0.003468918,0.0006866372,0.001192567,0.0009905385,0.002074741,0.0002849488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001435301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006368053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007799373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906731,0.006831404,0.0007721982,0.001074274,0.0004235662,0.0002253689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607828,0.03355529,0.002191722,0.002356292,0.0006739463,0.000440034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01059314,0.00007988299,0.009483628,0.01835209,0.9458844,0.0001531286,0.00005378201,0.003807022,0.0003752552,0.0003190442,0.0005215612,0.01037709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001543774,0.0004926183,0.004612179,0.0008643915,0.9899304,0.00006066392,0.00002469377,0.0008959079,0.0002677187,0.0006588423,0.000633073,0.00001578795],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2734741,0.6996855,0.01558048,0.002095024,0.0007062698,0.000749667,0.005065863,0.000400824,0.00224226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347345,0.05622786,0.005879339,0.0005456489,0.0001365809,0.0004734133,0.00140217,0.00008035613,0.0005201538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02125529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1670051823124323,"score_gpt":0.2672457084773481,"score_spread":0.1002405261649158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}