{"id":"W3121567777","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.012","title":"Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Eye Institute; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Leuphana Universität Lüneburg","keywords":"Plural; Economic Justice; Overexploitation; Threatened species; Fishery; Corporate governance; Sociology; Retributive justice; Stakeholder; Environmental justice; Fish stock; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Political science; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Law; Ecology; Business; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001022554,0.00005201184,0.00006414502,0.00002535803,0.00006372471,0.000007167574,0.000205317,0.00001991967,0.0003461874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006758645,0.0000380549,0.00003457295,0.0002481804,0.0001657204,0.0000403556,0.0005163629,0.00003521912,0.00002629025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008179437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001625986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05061786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003555027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995219,0.00002557647,0.0001019023,0.00008417166,0.0001695577,0.00009687261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996544,0.00001806809,0.00006928798,0.0002002926,0.00001057024,0.00004741358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006851038,0.00006407832,0.9621132,0.00001585224,0.000009415649,1.88006e-7,0.0005431277,0.0003932037,0.0001587439,0.00006651299,0.03418192,0.00244693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027954,0.00002462518,0.8818188,0.000002917406,0.00003769784,4.76771e-7,0.0004120748,0.0001233144,0.00009331715,0.0002589788,0.1168973,0.00005098691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8689424,0.000005056144,0.00004821405,0.004934944,0.00006714553,0.000104491,0.00001719034,0.000007944203,0.1258727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835935,0.000007580351,0.00008496171,0.0006027895,0.00003291046,0.000001352571,0.00000606925,0.000003115643,0.01566774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1146511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04862115354155864,"score_gpt":0.2306056265644244,"score_spread":0.1819844730228658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}