{"id":"W3121589371","doi":"10.1002/fut.21880","title":"Catastrophe futures and reinsurance contracts: An incomplete markets approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Futures Markets","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Bank of Canada; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reinsurance; Futures contract; Martingale (probability theory); Economics; Financial economics; Martingale pricing; Risk-neutral measure; Econometrics; Event (particle physics); Mathematical economics; Actuarial science; Martingale difference sequence; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001796854,0.000250066,0.0006883711,0.0002253636,0.0007527386,0.0004456859,0.0008218638,0.0001379351,0.00006409669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003526818,0.0002341077,0.0001731975,0.00006222431,0.0001554149,0.001145295,0.0001282679,0.000414137,0.00001241369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005939538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000231078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001086773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004209582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981812,0.00005358128,0.0009095366,0.0003494377,0.0001279891,0.000378315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996991,0.00004299442,0.001989602,0.0006901005,0.0001013373,0.0001849652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005825638,0.001332949,0.4250772,0.0005573014,0.001006314,0.0007779078,0.00324556,0.0001347383,0.0002871752,0.1501765,0.0702251,0.3413537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00131391,0.0001452306,0.8954737,0.0000434026,0.00001686747,0.00007627623,0.0001907347,0.0002563361,0.00001405117,0.005601136,0.09660883,0.000259495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534013,0.008515934,0.00146473,0.001061672,0.00199619,0.000259702,0.0001574331,0.00001423939,0.03312876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911408,0.002993421,0.003732604,0.000338718,0.001404716,0.000005966037,0.000005908481,0.00002919015,0.0003486355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4703966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9546636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239558838570066,"score_gpt":0.2331956153179233,"score_spread":0.2108000269322226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}