{"id":"W3121593275","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.05.005","title":"Intraday Value at Risk (IVaR) using tick-by-tick data with application to the Toronto Stock Exchange","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Empirical Finance","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Stock exchange; Expected shortfall; Value at risk; Transaction data; Computer science; Financial economics; Economics; Risk management; Statistics; Database transaction; Mathematics; Finance; Volatility (finance)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002571882,0.0003573145,0.000909521,0.00008456768,0.0002088095,0.0001475647,0.001713865,0.0002923088,0.00008442069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003367648,0.0002794047,0.0001779565,0.000213747,0.00006271658,0.0003552545,0.0009370057,0.0008984223,0.00001752634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001027919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001315586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001249871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007112178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971641,0.0001065027,0.001362943,0.000781831,0.000192565,0.000392054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952927,0.000175362,0.002380452,0.001835052,0.0001477247,0.0001687747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00243385,0.002056634,0.5876092,0.000643881,0.001068081,0.00006170149,0.003240369,0.03306733,0.0000342598,0.007610157,0.2329572,0.1292174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000502372,0.0002997054,0.1036074,0.0001565054,0.00008778054,0.00003339637,0.00001074655,0.4355553,0.00000336077,0.00935904,0.4498555,0.0005288692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.530889,0.01685073,0.4400385,0.00566534,0.0008648976,0.001038871,0.002185661,0.00001780173,0.002449236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640332,0.00780831,0.02515369,0.00117904,0.001054246,0.00002286577,0.0001064746,0.00007193802,0.0005701998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4840018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06556532138362309,"score_gpt":0.3126482844902833,"score_spread":0.2470829631066602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}