{"id":"W3121593275","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.05.005","title":"Intraday Value at Risk (IVaR) using tick-by-tick data with application to the Toronto Stock Exchange","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Empirical Finance","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Stock exchange; Expected shortfall; Value at risk; Transaction data; Computer science; Financial economics; Economics; Risk management; Statistics; Database transaction; Mathematics; Finance; Volatility (finance)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004424797,0.000831422,0.001409615,0.00263772,0.0005551269,0.002129519,0.001255363,0.001235508,0.002654213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02044209,0.000644456,0.001069548,0.003746727,0.0005387941,0.001839269,0.001331078,0.002131666,0.0006294327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007410979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009067243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04238215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0319147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.0006481414,0.00008549586,0.0001924128,0.0002216192,0.00008865575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898795,0.007428461,0.00082236,0.001134525,0.0005208257,0.0002142497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003776072,0.0002357238,0.06531011,0.0002366781,0.0006609833,0.0007359182,0.000476534,0.6528514,0.001548206,0.0508815,0.01403822,0.2126471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001741038,0.00002528342,0.006418521,0.00001633777,0.00002897658,0.00006465756,0.00006700739,0.9820179,0.0002226285,0.009962758,0.001136202,0.00002245259],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4033932,0.00402053,0.5771713,0.001217631,0.000282414,0.0001003376,0.005447024,0.004235093,0.004132431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.867447,0.001462684,0.1226095,0.0000619964,0.0002856457,0.00005004078,0.005241064,0.0005029594,0.002339215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04238215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08427089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06556532138362309,"score_gpt":0.3126482844902833,"score_spread":0.2470829631066602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}