{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617331,0.0001120975,0.0001795007,0.00007009623,0.0006341783,0.00004144178,0.0002474965,0.0001797122,0.0000629087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002087498,0.0001155467,0.00004701713,0.0002894444,0.03654731,0.0003394243,0.0001779971,0.0001894934,0.00003805052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001871475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007543706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01709482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984608,0.0002702133,0.00026828,0.0002555484,0.000435638,0.0003095329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.0003400088,0.00004878557,0.0001667046,0.00005523537,0.00008054156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042085,0.00007488431,0.00323561,0.000003161753,0.000003102512,0.00006096993,0.03407885,0.00001681309,0.0001184037,0.9618624,0.0004403615,0.0000549938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056936,0.00003630471,0.00101642,0.00003455585,0.000007433896,0.00000165863,0.004144544,0.0001132292,0.000187547,0.9930705,0.0008242935,0.0001577479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.615597,0.0002767264,0.004437005,0.0009747769,0.000274736,0.0002330789,0.000008012996,0.00008409291,0.3781146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974152,0.000325422,0.0004395943,0.001578572,0.0001613519,0.00001301045,0.00002593489,0.000008585883,0.00003227952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03512001175155976,"score_gpt":0.2922466806274343,"score_spread":0.2571266688758745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}