{"id":"W3121707458","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines in the Sand: Parliament's Jurisdiction to Consider Upstream and Downstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Interprovincial Pipeline Project Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Parliament; Greenhouse gas; Context (archaeology); Upstream (networking); Statutory law; Downstream (manufacturing); Legislation; Law; Energy law; Statutory interpretation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Business; Environmental law; Engineering; Politics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009212,0.0001633925,0.0002634511,0.0001909615,0.0005134944,0.0001251498,0.0002235134,0.0001042713,0.00004072731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001405831,0.00012994,0.0000589697,0.0005765526,0.0008082273,0.00022349,0.00005096004,0.0001804925,0.00002645779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001980604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006686234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07336305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.575859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984526,0.0002852132,0.0004288182,0.0003250742,0.0001626187,0.0003456774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992621,0.0002165158,0.000126673,0.0002188874,0.00005693256,0.0001188885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003752074,0.0009299738,0.08519257,0.0003115394,0.00005180081,0.0002043138,0.2683227,0.000157911,0.0007665579,0.2797161,0.1794748,0.1844964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260924,0.00008729898,0.002245718,0.001204949,0.00002670683,0.00003190626,0.00548325,0.000133786,0.00007317509,0.0006999475,0.9892021,0.0002850353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292699,0.0025531,0.0007229429,0.0322382,0.0006630053,0.003030273,0.0001694383,0.0000937521,0.03125936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945633,0.00216172,0.0003175686,0.001547471,0.0009248221,0.00008938475,0.000004289408,0.000007138902,0.0003842787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9328075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03909174575767575,"score_gpt":0.328515197735583,"score_spread":0.2894234519779073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}