{"id":"W3121707458","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines in the Sand: Parliament's Jurisdiction to Consider Upstream and Downstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Interprovincial Pipeline Project Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Parliament; Greenhouse gas; Context (archaeology); Upstream (networking); Statutory law; Downstream (manufacturing); Legislation; Law; Energy law; Statutory interpretation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Business; Environmental law; Engineering; Politics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02241612,0.0002364934,0.0006362973,0.001639986,0.01165567,0.01230393,0.00289879,0.008044706,0.004869314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05745032,0.0006578285,0.0007592164,0.002202153,0.007987319,0.005899849,0.005665217,0.006033145,0.0007760138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01610512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03608119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1333461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1770021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9710149,0.01375561,0.001169865,0.002121313,0.006841442,0.00509699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654694,0.02097621,0.001541107,0.001601155,0.008494242,0.001918003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001233067,0.00004015869,0.003082344,0.0002946112,0.00004639261,0.001805807,0.03743636,0.002322244,0.002045957,0.8506933,0.04379911,0.05831043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004570666,0.00009393552,0.004559756,0.0006115927,0.0001579428,0.0003995213,0.01805669,0.001957211,0.002250785,0.1000109,0.8716847,0.0001712241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1880852,0.01558655,0.03441111,0.1676799,0.002563522,0.0004193733,0.0003936226,0.0003116222,0.5905492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324646,0.002178297,0.004728148,0.01320302,0.000534981,0.0001270542,0.00009453655,0.0001646302,0.04650466],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2651398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03909174575767575,"score_gpt":0.328515197735583,"score_spread":0.2894234519779073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}